Landing the plane in
the
uncharted islet: GRI
and
Integrated
Reporting
in
Zimbabwe.

Pascal Shuro

Michael Rea says that "By making public every company's compliance with GRI
Guidelines, I believe company officials will strive not only to report better but use
this information to bring the most important issues to the attention of their boards,
and consequently, be more responsible in their business dealings."

The Climate crisis has adverse impacts on the local, national, regional and
international economies; there is a need for reporting frameworks that can make
companies sustainable. Let's assume you are an investor, which weather-related,
social, and corporate governance risks would you consider when approaching an
investment opportunity? Which reports would use to see the potential of the
company? Corporate governance, financial statements and social responsibility reporting
standards have been with us for some time, nonetheless now there is a need for
reporting standard frameworks that encompass all the non-financial aspects and
link them to financial performance. The 21st century has experienced changes, and
appreciation of intangible assets over tangible assets is one. Sceptics would the
tempted to go with the notion that financial statements show a lot, but its
unrealistic. Then how so?

Ocean Tomo identifies that in 2021 tangible assets are commanding 80% more
value than their tangible assets. Income balance sheet, cash flow and statements of
shareholder equity are just not enough to measure a company's performance. But
non-financial (intellectual property, human capital, environmental, and social and
relationships) have more worth. And can influence a company's value.
Companies have become more aware of the effect of society how it sees them, that
it is more powerful than usually anticipated. Robert Greene says that reputation is
far more important to be protected, and one should guard it with their life; Using
non-financial reports can help keep the reputation alive. Zimbabwe lags. This is a
problem when one looks into the medium and long-run of the organization. Several
reporting standard frameworks look into non-financial aspects. The major two are
the Global Reporting Initiative and Integrated Reporting (created by International
Reporting Council) standard framework. GRI and IR have been used in South
Africa by gurus such as Michael Rea to produce compliance and sustainability
reports.

Using Global Reporting Initiative allows companies to identify risks that might
affect the business. GRI reports show organizational impact on the environment
and allow investors to identify risks and companies which meet their criteria. Implementing GRI reporting helps customers and other stakeholders to understand to identify the organization's nature stewardship initiatives. The greenness of a company is often used to identify fitting holders of tenders and protects the
organization from public scrutiny and litigation. These have the potential to disrupt
the acceptability of the firm by its local and international customers. The GRI
standard framework is easy to use and can be applied to any industry and provides
simple language than the G4 framework. Transitioning to use GRI helps in
identifying strengths and weaknesses and makes it possible to come up with
strategies to motivate employees. And helps to improve vision and strategy, and
Management systems.

Integrated Reporting is another framework that can be implemented. IR can be
implemented to help companies to create and protect their value. By looking into
six capital essentials and how they relate with the company value. There is a need
for corporate, human capital, intellectual, environmental reporting so that investors
better understand how much the company is worth and what risks is it associated
with. These two frameworks if implemented by companies they will see their
profits triple, allows them to better plan as they have the data, and make the
company more trustworthy and accountable.

Implementing GRI and IR standard frameworks is vital for companies, and this can
help companies lure capital investment to the company. If implemented in
Zimbabwe will see companies competing with regional competitors in South
Africa, Kenya, Rwanda, Nigeria to mention a few of the countries where the
frameworks have been implemented. Furthermore, using the two will help in strengthening stakeholder engagement and identifying competitive advantage. And trust. When one looks at Zimbabwe we are in a (VUCA)volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous environment, consequently, there is a need for tools that can solidify and strengthen companies value.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog